“Credible Elements” as the Foundation of Logical Constructions — On Belief
In the process of logical thinking, becoming aware of the crucial—and foundational—role of “credible elements” is essential. Starting from any primitive cognition, we can mentally simulate what kind of subsequent world might unfold from it. One can experience this in life, or simply observe it in the world. A person’s system of thought is built upon some of their most fundamental beliefs; and that system of thought, in turn, constructs the external world—companies, groups, institutions, societies, nations. All of these outward structures are “logical constructions,” formed spontaneously based on certain doctrines or credos that serve as their foundation.
Thus, when facing these immense and seemingly intangible structures, the most important task is to identify the core credo that underpins them. If that credo is closed and negative, the logical construction built upon it will not be healthy and will inevitably collapse. Only positive and open credos can create large-scale logical constructions that are stable, healthy, and able to keep developing.
On this point, I am aligned with Fukuyama’s view in Trust. Fukuyama discusses trust as the basis for building large-scale private enterprises. That is correct—trust is indeed the foundation of human cooperation. But I believe trust itself is the result of relationships that arise from a person’s most fundamental beliefs. Trust is not the most basic unit. The original credo that a person chooses to believe is the true foundation.
Human beings can accomplish countless seemingly impossible things because of “belief”—for example, the architectural, artistic, and cultural achievements within religions. I think all of these are deeply connected to “faith.” Science operates in the same way: scientific progress happens because some scientists maintain an open mindset and dedicate themselves to exploration and verification. This process is essentially a search for the “credible element” in their minds. Once a scientist finds their own credible element, they gain a sense of conviction or faith. Ultimately, faith has nothing to do with religion—it is simply the result of choosing to believe in a particular sentence, principle, or credo.
Therefore, choosing one's beliefs—and choosing one’s “credible elements”—must be done with great care. When we are not yet certain, we should avoid easily adopting closed credos such as “I can’t do it,” “I’m incapable,” or “I don’t have the ability.” This aligns with neuroscientific research on neural networks: a healthy neural network must remain open, continuously learning and updating. Otherwise, it will eventually lead to mental breakdown, premature aging, and a wide range of human health problems associated with decline.
In this sense, logical constructions are like abstract organisms. They are not dead—they must remain alive in order to continue.